What Is Art?
If only the spectators or auditors are infected by the feelings which the author has felt, it is art.
(Tolstoy)
Oh, I guess to make this one art, I have to tell you what I felt when I did this shot: "*#'#*~~~##***, I should really try harder to focus!"
:)))))
Commentaire
89
Information
| Section | Special: Emotions |
| Dossier | user's favorites |
| Vu de | 30 438 |
| Publiée | |
| Langue |
|
| Licence |
Favoris publics
Copier la photo
Insère le lien suivant dans un commentaire, une description ou un message pour montrer cette image.
Copier le lien...
Clique, STP, sur le lien et utilise la combinaison de touches "Ctrl C" [Win] ou "Cmd C" le [Mac] autour du lien à copier.
Antis 02/02/2014 1:11
point without point;(:)s.m.j.soghrati 01/02/2013 12:12
agreeAlexsander B.B. 15/12/2010 7:01
I like image visual influence & frame too)dorukseymen 21/11/2010 22:31
amazing. nice workmuhammad karim 02/10/2010 19:38
very inspiring and beyond imagination...greatrgds
hedyeh 15/07/2010 12:25
your finger :-))that is true?!!
Media Rahmani 25/06/2010 11:08
stark............Serge Sophienczuk-Wojczyszyn 20/06/2010 22:02
Many thanks for the welcome mail.What is art? Does this photo answers? Or — the picture offered another question — more for feeling than for intellect. . . .
The theme is profound: HJSyberberg in his Parsifal-installation (Documenta vii) shows the change of st. Graal radiance from red to white (and Mark the Gnostic in his pseudomiracle change white wine in transparent chalice to red, as st. Irinæus report), — blood will be light, flash will be spirit, hard work will be joyful contemplation of the fruits, — but the light may become bloody, spirit may become fleshly and contemplation may become as a hard work. All this is about art. And what is about photo? Does its question is “profound”? The spectator stops rhetorical talking about work — and looks — and that`s good result (Wagner`s Parsifal asked: “Wer ist der Gral?” Gurnemanz replayed: “Das sagt sich nicht. . . Sieh!”) . . . But does the pause in talking is really deep?
Minimalism is in search of the symbol that pose obstacle for mind. This picture is good essay on such way, but not the invention. Standard format with nonrealistic minimal image and galvanizing question in title — bella idea! — But the frame of invitation mail substantially supports this paradox.
The invention of said Mark Rothko (better — of the abstract expressionism) was the colored surface. When we abstract image from material surface — we may activate some other elements for replenishment of the language, e.g. integrate “literary” title, citation, author`s comment into image (imitation of poster). This is not the question of this successful attempt. But this set up a base for the successful work.
Rob7Crown 15/06/2010 3:38
Art is what you create with your imaginary thought.Hai Hoang 11/05/2010 11:42
Day and NightDr.Szirmai János 07/05/2010 10:18
Excellent composition! I like it very much! Many thank's for the fotomail! Hi JánosKambiz Bagheri 17/04/2010 6:12
Thank you very much.Excellent !!!
Deb Watts 29/03/2010 0:06
Thank you for your help with fotomail and my welcome. I am very much a newbie to all of this.iyunk cruise 27/12/2009 13:01
picture worth a thousandwordDragomir Vukovic 21/12/2009 21:05
excellent !